Review Process

ITB conference uses double-blind review, which means that both the reviewer and author identities are concealed from the reviewers, and vice versa, throughout the review process. Each paper will be assigned to 02 reviewers. the paper will be accepted only if the final decision by each reviewer is accept or minor accept based on these metrics:

 

Level of original contribution: (Reject/ Minor Accept/ Accept)

Novelty of research contribution: (Reject/ Minor Accept/ Accept)

Presentation of contribution: (Reject/ Minor Accept/ Accept)

Structure, Language, and Clarity: (Reject/ Minor Accept/ Accept)

Did the reviewer check equations (if exist): (Yes/No)

Did authors compare their obtained results with other work(s)?: (Yes/No)

What is the strengths of this paper: ……… ….. …. ….. ….. …. … …

……………… … … .. . . . . . . . . . . .  …………. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .  .

What is the weakness of this paper: . . . . . …………….. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

…… . . . . . . . . .. . ………………… . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .

Comments and Questions. . . . . . . . . . . …………………….. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

…. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . ………………. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Final decision: (Reject/ Minor Accept/ Accept)